ArticleThe Gerontologist2025
When and how is age mentioned? The role of age references in narratives of adults aged 65 and over.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesBoth societal and personal beliefs about aging shape how older adults experience and respond to age-related changes. This study explores how adults aged 65 years and above internalize or resist aging stereotypes and beliefs through age-related references embedded in daily experiences. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsData were drawn from three research projects on relationships, sexuality, and employment in later life, each with a minimum age requirement of 50 years. For the secondary data analysis within this study, we selected 50 participants aged 65+ years from a total pool of 189 in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis methods were used to derive themes related to the context and function of age references.
resultsResults highlight four key contexts in which participants referred to age: (1) seeking balance between autonomy and limitations, (2) navigating societal versus personal expectations, (3) legitimizing end-of-life reflections, and (4) reframing hassles as unnecessary. In these contexts, references to age served two primary functions: (1) providing relief and (2) navigating decline. (3) Avoiding mentioning age constituted a unique third function. Participants employed these references to manage experiences of decline and seek relief from the discomfort associated with aging. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings from the present study suggest that age references-including some rooted in ageist stereotypes-play a key role in how older adults navigate the aging process. These references help normalize limitations, express discomfort, or avoid confronting declines, thereby supporting adaptation and emotional balance. Recognizing their function may guide interventions that enhance adaptive uses while reducing risks of internalizing harmful stereotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.