Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41275267›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

The spatial effects and influencing factors of inter-provincial health resource allocation efficiency in China.

Nannan Meng, Ziming Wan, Hao Chen, Tong Pei, Xinhao Lin, Dan Wu, Yating Chen, Xuehui Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nannan MengDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Ziming WanDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Hao ChenDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Tong PeiSchool of Humanities and Management, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xinhao LinSchool of Humanities and Management, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Dan WuSchool of Humanities and Management, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yating ChenSchool of Humanities and Management, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. 59508582@qq.com.
Xuehui MengSchool of Humanities and Management, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. mengxuehui@aliyun.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChinese government has been adjusting its strategies in response to rapid domestic and international changes to devise effective health policies and enhance public health. However, with the rapid socio-economic development and the COVID-19 outbreak, many researchers have identified issues of inefficiency and uneven distribution in health resource allocation within China. Therefore, how to scientifically allocate and efficiently use Chinese health resources has become an urgent issue.

methodsThe super-efficiency SBM model and global Malmquist model were used to measure and dynamically monitor the health resource allocation efficiency of 31 provinces in China from 2008 to 2020. Moran's I was applied to test the spatial autocorrelation of the efficiency, and the spatial Dubin model was constructed to analyze influencing factors. All data were collected from the China Health Statistical Yearbook and China Statistical Yearbook from 2008 to 2020.

resultsThe super-efficiency SBM model revealed an average health resource allocation efficiency score of 0.632. The average Malmquist productivity index for the same period was 1.090, indicating a generally positive growth. Moran's I test showed a notable spatial autocorrelation in efficiency distribution. And the regression results of the spatial Dubin model showed that the efficiency was affected by the dependency ratio, illiteracy rate, per capita disposable income, per capita public health budget expenditure, number of medical insurance participants, and the balance of medical insurance fund revenue and expenditure. DISCUSSIONS: The results revealed that China's health resource allocation exhibited low efficiency and regional disparities, primarily driven by uneven regional development. From 2008 to 2020, overall productivity increased by 9%, which were predominantly attributable to technological advancements. Under conditions of strong spatial autocorrelation, the efficiency of health resource allocation was shaped by multiple factors operating through distinct spatial channels.

conclusionGiven the challenges of health resource allocation efficiency in China, it is vital to implement targeted strategies. These include strengthening policy support for inefficiency regions, relying on technological progress and scientific management, fostering cross-regional collaboration to leverage spatial effects, and considering multiple factors for rational health resource allocation to ensure the sustainability of the health services.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalHealth Care RationingResource AllocationChinaCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2Spatial AnalysisGlobal Malmquist indexHealth resource allocationSpatial autocorrelationSpatial dubin modelSuper-efficiency SBM model

Identifiers

PMID41275267
PMCPMC12659105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.