ArticleBMC psychology2025
Culturally and structurally embedded pathways to youth self-harm in Rwanda: perspectives from young people, parents, and healthcare providers.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSelf-harm (with and without fatal intent) among young people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain under-researched despite disproportionately high rates. Little is known about the social, cultural, and psychological factors influencing these behaviours in settings such as Rwanda. The study aimed to explore how young people in Rwanda, their parents, and healthcare providers perceive and experience self-harm, including the psychological, social, and cultural factors that contribute to self-harm.
methodsThis qualitative study used a phenomenologically informed approach. Semi-structured interviews were held with 102 participants across two districts of Rwanda: Gasabo (urban) and Nyagatare (rural), which have high prevalence of self-harm/suicidality, including young people with and without self-harm experience, parents of young people with and without such experience, and healthcare professionals. Data were analysed thematically, using iterative coding, with triangulation and member-checking to enhance rigour.
resultsFive themes emerged: 1) Diverse triggers and reasons-including family conflict, abuse, poverty, peer dynamics, and school-related stress; 2) Build-up of emotional and psychological distress-highlighting feelings of entrapment, isolation, and worthlessness; 3) Functions and characteristics of self-harm, ranging from emotional regulation to communication of distress; 4) Maintenance and cessation, showing the role of coping strategies, social support, and barriers to seeking help; and 5) Duality of community responses, where community responses both exacerbated stigma and provided support. Self-harm was shaped by cultural beliefs, stigma, family and social structures, and poverty, challenging individualistic framings of self-harm. Reflexive insights highlight the importance of team communication during cross-cultural research and provide practical strategies.
conclusionsFindings extend existing psychological theories by evidencing culturally embedded pathways to youth self-harm, where distress is produced and sustained through a mixture of individual experience, structural hardship, social exclusion, and cultural belief systems. Effective prevention requires cross-sectoral strategies addressing poverty, education, family support, and community mental health. Community-based approaches fostering emotional expression and reducing stigma could play a crucial role in prevention and recovery. The insights generated are transferable to other LMICs facing similar social and structural challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.