ArticleBMC health services research2025
Differences in the utilization of physical therapy for outpatients with non-specific shoulder pain labels and specific shoulder pain labels.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNational data on the characteristics of ambulatory visits with non-specific shoulder pain (NSSP) labels are lacking. The aim of this study was to identify the differences in the utilization of physical therapy (PT) for visits with NSSP labels and visits with specific shoulder pain (SSP) labels by using National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) database.
methodsThe NAMCS was queried from 2007 to 2016 to identify the ambulatory visits for shoulder pain. The study population was stratified according to the top 3 diagnoses, including NSSP group and SSP group. Data on patient, practice and visit characteristics were included, as variables in both descriptive and adjusted analyses. Differences in these characteristics and clinical management for the two groups were tested. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the association between the diagnosis type and utilization of PT.
resultsAn estimated total of 86.49 million adult ambulatory visits for shoulder pain were identified in this study. Of these, 24.31 million visits (28.1%) were assigned to NSSP labels. Combining all years, PT was prescribed in approximately 10.8% of visits with NSSP labels, which was significantly lower than visits with SSP labels (22.2%). After adjustment for covariates including age, sex, race, expected source of payment, metropolitan statistical area (MSA), major reason for this visit, injury related, referred for this visit, continuity of care, number of medical comorbidities, and physician specialty, visits assigned to NSSP labels had significantly lower odds of prescribing PT compared to visits assigned to SSP labels (adjusted OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41-0.94).
conclusionsThe results of this retrospective cross-sectional study identified the significant differences in the utilization of PT for ambulatory visits with NSSP labels and SSP labels by using NAMCS database. These findings may help diminish management disparities and improve appropriate use of PT in the ambulatory management of shoulder pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.