ArticleBMC public health2025
How do social norms influence the sexual and reproductive health-related attitudes and behaviours of very young adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa? A scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Menstrual Health Under Constraint: A Meta-Synthesis of Refugee Women's Experiences.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), very young adolescents (aged 10-14 years) have the worst sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes of this age group worldwide due to a range of factors, including social and gender norms. However, in this setting, SRH programming often focuses on older adolescents (aged 15-19 years), overlooking very young adolescents. This scoping review sought to explore how social and gender norms influence very young adolescents' SRH-related attitudes and behaviours in SSA and draw inferences for culturally sensitive, gender-responsive interventions.
methodsThe review followed the five-step framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley: (1) defining the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting studies, (4) charting the data, and (5) collating, summarising, and reporting the results. We searched four databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Global Health, and Web of Science) for peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2024.
resultsWe identified 24 studies: n = 11 (46%) were entirely qualitative, n = 8 (33%) exclusively quantitative, and three other quantitative studies incorporated qualitative components. Two studies used participatory techniques. Studies were from nine countries in SSA. Identified norms included those relating to menstruation, puberty, circumcision, romantic relationships and gender stereotypes. Social norms led to very young adolescents' limited SRH knowledge and access, and behaviours and practices that heightened very young adolescents' vulnerabilities and poor SRH outcomes. Evaluations of interventions to shift these norms reported mixed results, and highlighted the importance of adapting gender-responsive/gender-transformative interventions to the local context.
conclusionsScoping review findings affirm the importance of intervening in very young adolescence to positively influence social and gender norms. The review underscores the importance of tailored, multifaceted, culturally sensitive, gender-responsive/gender-transformative interventions to improve young adolescents' SRH-related attitudes and behaviours in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.