ArticleBMC public health2025
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R).
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUp to one third of women are dissatisfied with their birth experience. A negative birth experience can have detrimental outcomes, making an early detection of dissatisfaction with the birth experience very important. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) is a multi-dimensional measure of birth satisfaction, which has been translated into several languages. The current study aimed to translate and validate a German version of the BSS-R (DE-BSS-R).
methodsA total of 3747 German women, who were participating in the cross-sectional study INVITE, completed the DE-BSS-R 3–4 months postpartum. The factor structure of the DE-BSS-R was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, internal consistency as well as known-groups discriminant, divergent, convergent, and predictive validity were evaluated.
resultsBoth the tri-dimensional and the bi-factor measurement model of the original BSS-R showed excellent fit to the data. Internal consistency was acceptable for the total score and the subscale Women’s personal attributes, but just below the recommended cut-off for the subscales Stress experienced during labour and Quality of care. However, Cronbach’s alpha did not differ significantly from the acceptable alpha values of the original BSS-R. Women with a non-instrumental vaginal birth had significantly higher birth satisfaction than women with an instrumental birth (instrumental vaginal, caesarean section). The DE-BSS-R showed good divergent, convergent, and predictive validity.
conclusionsOverall, the German cross-cultural adaptation of the BSS-R showed excellent psychometric properties. Both the total score and the three subscale scores are valid to quickly measure German women’s satisfaction with birth in research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.