ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Sensitivity of RSV detection by PCR in respiratory samples is not reduced by a 24 h delay from sampling to testing with storage at room temperature.
Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a common cause of severe respiratory tract disease in infants, the elderly and immunocompromised patients. However, there is uncertainty as to how sample handling practices affect performance of tests to detect RSV. The aim of this study was to determine whether RSV RNA remains reliably detectable in nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP/OP) samples, saliva, and sputum samples over time.Respiratory samples were collected as part of a prospective observational study of acute lower respiratory tract disease (aLRTD) hospitalisations in adults in Bristol (UK). Samples that tested positive by PCR on receipt (0 h), were re-tested at 24 h having been stored at room temperature. We found that all but one of the samples PCR-positive for RSV at 0 h remained positive at 24 h, across all sample types and RSV strains. Ct values for NP/OP and saliva samples were significantly lower at 24 h than at 0 h, suggesting potential low-level viral replication in the samples. These results suggest that RSV tests can provide consistent results after a delay of up to 24 h following sample collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.