SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2026
Sex and gender influence on adverse events for melanoma patients: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapy (IMMUNO) and targeted therapy (TT) have revolutionised melanoma treatment. However, adverse events (AEs) remain frequent and may affect treatment adherence. Female sex has been linked to a higher risk of AEs in cytotoxic therapies. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the effect of Sex and Gender (S/G) on AEs during IMMUNO and/or TT in melanoma. Independent studies published up to April 2024 reporting toxicity by S/G in melanoma patients were included. Summary Odds Ratios (sOR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Sixty-nine studies were included. Women had a significantly higher risk of thyroid-related AEs compared to men (sOR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.41-2.82, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.