Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effect of pneumatic and cold compression on muscle performance and recovery in combat sports athletes.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The relationship between post-occlusive reactive hyperemia and the level of training and lifestyle in young adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the comparative effectiveness of three recovery interventions-pneumatic intermittent compression therapy (PICT) at pressures of 25 mmHg and 100 mmHg, cryo-compression therapy (CCT), and passive rest-on muscle recovery following exercise-induced fatigue in professional combat sports athletes. The primary aim was to determine which method better facilitates physiological and perceptual recovery after a fatigue protocol typical for combat sports demands. Forty-eight highly trained male and female athletes aged 18 to 40 years, each with a minimum of three years' combat training experience, participated in this randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated equally into four groups corresponding to the recovery modalities. The fatigue protocol involved repeated maximal plyometric box jumps until exhaustion to induce muscular stress and damage. Recovery interventions were administered immediately post-exercise, and at 24 and 48 h thereafter. Measurements were recorded at baseline, immediately post-fatigue, 30 min, and 48 h following the recovery intervention. Physiological outcomes included tissue perfusion assessed via laser Doppler flowmetry, muscle elasticity measured with a myotonometer, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity as a marker of muscle damage, reactive strength index (RSI) obtained from jump tests, and pressure pain threshold (PPT) to evaluate soreness. Data analysis revealed significant improvements in tissue perfusion and muscle elasticity with both pneumatic compression and cryo-compression therapies when compared to passive rest. Notably, PICT at 100 mmHg maintained superior muscle elasticity up to 48 h post-exercise, while CCT produced a more immediate reduction in muscle soreness. LDH activity increased across all groups following fatigue, reflecting muscle damage. RSI decreased initially but showed differential recovery patterns depending on the intervention. In conclusion, compression therapies demonstrate clear benefits in accelerating recovery processes through enhanced blood flow and improved muscle mechanical properties, with pressure magnitude influencing outcomes. The findings support the clinical application of targeted compression strategies to optimize recovery in combat athletes, potentially improving performance and reducing injury risk. Further studies should explore long-term effects and integrate additional functional and biochemical parameters to refine rehabilitation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.