ArticleScientific reports2025
An intelligent job scheduling and real-time resource optimization for edge-cloud continuum in next generation networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DRL-based multi-objective task scheduling for edge-cloud computing: latency, energy, and SLA optimisation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While cloud-edge infrastructures demand flexible and sophisticated resource management, 6G networks necessitate very low latency, great dependability, and broad connection. Cloud computing's scalability and agility enable it to prioritize service delivery at various levels of detail while serving billions of users. However, due to resource inefficiencies, virtual machine (VM) issues, response delays, and deadline violations, real-time task scheduling is challenging in these settings. This study develops an AI-powered task scheduling system based on the newly published Unfair Semi-Greedy (USG) algorithm, Earliest Deadline First (EDF), and Enhanced Deadline Zero-Laxity (EDZL) algorithm. The system chooses the best scheduler based on load and work criticality by combining reinforcement learning adaptive logic with a dynamic resource table. Over 10,000 soft real-time task sets were utilized to evaluate the framework across various cloud-edge scenarios. When compared to solo EDF and EDZL solutions, the recommended hybrid method reduced average response times by up to 26.3% and deadline exceptions by 41.7%. The USG component achieved 98.6% task stimulability under saturated edge settings, indicating significant changes in workload. These findings suggest that the method might be useful for applications that need a speedy turnaround. This architecture is especially well-suited for autonomous systems, remote healthcare, and immersive media, all of which require low latency and dependability, and it may be extended to AI-native 6G networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.