Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41274927›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Neuron-specific homologous coding genes and non-coding regulatory regions are the most conserved amongst amniotes despite neuron-specific cell size diversity.

Linhe Xu, Suzana Herculano-Houzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linhe XuDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Suzana Herculano-HouzelDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA. suzana.herculano@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons are unique in that they are the only cell type in the body to display massive diversity in cell size, morphology, phenotype, and function both within individuals and across species. Previous studies comparing human to mouse and chimpanzee genomes reported that neuron-specific sequences are more conserved than nonneuronal-specific sequences, which is seemingly at odds with the enormous variation that we have documented in neuronal, but not nonneuronal, cell densities across individuals and hundreds of species. Here we use datasets encompassing up to 92 mammalian and 31 sauropsidian species to examine whether neuron-specific diversity occurs with higher evolutionary variation of homologous neuron-specific coding genes and regulatory regions compared to non-neuronal counterparts across the entirety of amniotes. We find that neuronal diversity in mammalian and sauropsidian evolution arose despite extreme levels of average negative selection on homologous neuron-specific protein-coding sequences which we show to be on par with ATPase coding sequences, the benchmark of evolutionary conservation. Further, we show that the high conservation of homologous neuron-specific sequences is not simply attributable to high expression levels. We argue that such strong evolutionary conservation may be imposed by excitability, which continually exposes neurons to the risk of excitotoxic death.

Indexed as

NeuronsOpen Reading FramesRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsCell SizeConserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularHumansMammalsMicedN/dSGlial cellsMolecular evolutionNegative selectionNeuronal diversityphastCons

Identifiers

PMID41274927
PMCPMC12711955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.