ArticleScientific data2025
A dataset of building surface defects collected by UAVs for machine learning-based detection.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent Recognition of Building Facade Defects: A Multilevel Review from Visual Perception to Engineering Operations and Maintenance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- UAV and Deep Learning for Building Façade Defect Detection: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual inspection of civil infrastructure has traditionally relied on manual operations, characterized by high labor intensity, low efficiency, and limited scalability, which significantly constrains its effectiveness in modern maintenance and management scenarios. Although deep learning technologies have demonstrated remarkable potential for automation and precision, their practical implementation in real-world engineering contexts remains hindered by the scarcity of large-scale, high-quality annotated datasets. To address this challenge, this study constructs a UAV-based dataset of building surface defects, comprising 14,471 high-resolution images captured across six structural types and five representative defect categories from both urban and rural environments. The dataset includes various defect types such as cracks, abscission, leakage, corrosion, and bulging, recorded under diverse illumination and environmental conditions. Each image is annotated with standardized bounding boxes and systematically divided into training, validation, and testing subsets. This dataset provides a comprehensive, diverse, and publicly accessible benchmark for advancing multi-task research in defect detection, segmentation, and automated visual assessment of building surfaces.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.