ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-epitope vaccine design against human metapneumovirus via reverse vaccinology and molecular modelling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Human metapneumovirus (HMPV) is a respiratory viral pathogen classified within the Paramyxoviridae family and is a significant cause of acute respiratory tract infections. The vaccine construct maintains stable binding affinity with targeted receptors anaffects young children, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. HMPV was recognized initially in 2001. HMPV exhibits characteristics similar to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and generally causes symptoms ranging from mild, cold-like signs to more severe issues such as pneumonia and bronchiolitis. This study employs reverse vaccinology and bioinformatics approaches to screen potential vaccine targets and design epitope vaccine constructs. Following immunoinformatics analysis, six proteins, including >YP_009513265.1 nucleoprotein, >YP_009513266.1 phosphoprotein, >YP_009513268.1 fusion protein, >YP_009513269.1 matrix protein 2-1, >YP_009513272.1 attachment glycoprotein, and >YP_009513273.1 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, were selected for further analysis. These proteins underwent B-cell epitope prediction, and the identified B-cell epitopes were used in T cell epitope prediction. Both MHC-I and MHC-II epitopes were predicted, with lower percentile scores prioritized. The selected epitopes- SLGKIKNNK, IPQNQRPSA, IPSEPKLAW, FPEDQNVAL, KLKNKNRLR, ELSSIKTRR, and QEKKLVPVY- were further screened through immunoinformatics analysis. These epitopes were connected with a GPGPG linker to form a linear sequence, and an EAAAK linker was used to attach the adjuvant to this sequence, which was then processed for structural modeling. Effective vaccines must bind to receptors on immune cells to activate the immune system. The vaccine-TLR-4 docked complex, predicted using Cluspro 2. 2.0 web server, showed that cluster 4 had the lowest binding energy score of - 1175. 3, indicating potential effectiveness in eliciting an immune response via TLR-4 activation. Similarly, for the vaccine- MHC-I complex, cluster 2 exhibited the lowest energy score of - 1087. 4 kcal/mol, suggesting a stable binding interaction. For the vaccine-MHC-II complex, cluster 2 showed the most stable binding with a lowest energy score of - 1189. 1 kcal/mol. To validate these docking results, molecular dynamics simulations analyze the stability of the complexes. The RMSD from the simulations indicated that the vaccine- MHC-I complex stabilized around 10 to 12 (Å). The vaccine-MHC-II complex stabilized after 60 ns, while the vaccine-TLR-4 complex initially showed a lower RMSD of approximately 5 (Å), which gradually increased to 12-15 (Å), reflecting conformational stability and binding affinity. In addition, in silico immune simulations suggested activation of both humoral and cellular immunity, indicating that the vaccine construct could effectively induce immune responses against HMPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.