SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Food Environment and Childhood Overweight/Obesity: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mediating effects of home environment on the relationship between maternal BMI and childhood obesity: Findings from the ECHO-wide cohort.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Associations of Neighborhood Food Access with Child Body Mass Index and Obesity.Childhood obesity (Print) · 2026Article
- Article
- Family-Based Dietary Counselling in Pediatric Obesity: A Proposed System-Oriented Framework Integrating Home, School, and Social Environments.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Fruit and Vegetable Accessibility in the Home: Intervention Changes and Cross-Sectional Associations with Diet Quality.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood overweight/obesity has emerged as a pressing public health concern globally, and the impact of the food environment on children's diets and health outcomes has gained heightened attention. Comprehensive and child-specific monitoring systems are critical for guiding targeted interventions and policies. This review aimed to synthesize recent literature on food environment indicators associated with children with overweight/obesity using the 4A framework, including food availability, accessibility, affordability, and appeal. We conducted a systematic search of peer-reviewed literature (2020-2025). This systematic review is guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and involved narrative synthesis and framework-based classification (CRD420251116187). A total of 75 observational and 6 intervention studies are included. Indicators related to availability (e.g., home food supply and fast food outlet density) and accessibility (e.g., proximity to healthy food stores) are most commonly studied, whereas affordability and appeal indicators (e.g., food pricing and marketing exposure) are less frequently addressed. Current evidence underscores deficiencies in the measurement and monitoring of the food environment for children, which is important to prevent and manage childhood overweight/obesity using integrated indicators at home, schools, communities, and society. Moreover, there is a necessity to develop a standardized, child-centered food environment monitoring system, facilitating prompt, equity-sensitive policy action to address children with overweight/obesity on a worldwide scale, which also supports global sustainable development. This systematic review paper will be useful for selecting indicators to construct a food environment monitoring system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.