ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2026
Proportion of Fast Progressors in the Central versus Global Visual Field Across Varying Glaucoma Severity Groups.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the prevalence of fast central visual field (VF) progression with global VF progression in individuals with glaucoma receiving routine clinical care across different stages of glaucoma severity at baseline.
designRetrospective cohort study.
methodsThis study included 1117 eyes of 759 participants with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with at least five 24-2 VF tests over a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Eyes were classified as early (>-6 dB), moderate (-6 dB to -12 dB), and advanced (-12 dB to -20 dB) based on baseline VF mean deviation (MD). The slopes of global MD and central mean total deviation (MTD
resultsOverall, 7.5% of eyes demonstrated fast rates of progression based on MD, while 12.8% of eyes showed fast rates of progression based on MTD
conclusionsSelective analysis of the MTD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.