ArticleInflammatory bowel diseases2026
Differences in Anti-αvβ6 Integrin Antibody Expression between U.S. and Japanese Cohorts in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Article in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), have complex pathologies requiring precise diagnostic tools. We evaluated the clinical utility of anti-integrin αvβ6 antibodies in diagnosing UC, focusing on differences between a U.S. cohort (self-reported White) and a Japanese cohort, and additionally assessed whether combining anti-αvβ6 with anti-EPCR improved diagnostic performance.
methodsSerum anti-αvβ6 antibody levels were measured in 1138 participants (514 in the U.S. cohort, 624 in the Japanese cohort), including 1093 IBD cases and 45 healthy control subjects. Positivity rates and titers were compared between cohorts, and associations with clinical subphenotypes and anti-EPCR were examined.
resultsAnti-αvβ6 positivity was significantly higher in UC patients (85.4%) than in CD patients (16.4%) or control subjects (0%). Within UC, high positivity was observed across all disease extents, with only minor cohort differences. Longer disease duration was associated with lower positivity in both cohorts. In CD, the U.S. cohort showed higher positivity (23.4%) than the Japanese cohort (10.1%), particularly in colonic CD. Absence of ileal involvement, strictures, or perianal disease was associated with higher positivity. Anti-αvβ6 and anti-EPCR levels were strongly correlated, but their expression patterns differed in primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated IBD. Combining anti-αvβ6 and anti-EPCR improved UC diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.00) over either antibody alone (P = .00264).
conclusionsAnti-αvβ6 is a valuable biomarker for UC diagnosis. However, this study demonstrated differences in its behavior between U.S. and Japanese cohorts, particularly in CD. Cohort-informed interpretation and combined antibody testing may improve diagnostic precision and disease stratification in IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.