ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2026
Effect of stent-graft length and compliance on aortic hemodynamics in a bench-top physiological flow circuit.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting the tension-free paradigm: Axially prestretched elastomeric nanofibrillar grafts restore artery-like axial biomechanics in a preclinical model.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Femoral Plaque Burden and Left Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Stent-graft compliance modulates regional mechanical and structural remodeling of the aorta.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Windkessel Preserving Aortic Stent Graft Attenuates Left Ventricular Remodelling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in a Porcine Model.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2026Article
- Effect of stent-graft compliance on hemodynamics and aortic stiffening in an in vivo porcine study.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aortic elasticity plays a vital role in buffering pulsatile blood flow, propelling blood to distal organs and the heart, and reducing cardiac workload. Aortic repair with a stent-graft can reduce this elasticity and hinder the aorta's ability to effectively perform its function. Conventional stent-grafts are associated with increased arterial stiffness, elevated pulse wave velocity (PWV), and adverse hemodynamic changes. This is largely driven by stiffness mismatch between the stent-graft and the native aortic wall, which alters mechanical compliance and hemodynamic response. This study evaluates a novel compliant nanofiber stent-graft (NF-SG) developed to closely mimic native aortic mechanics. Using a bench-top physiological flow circuit, we assessed the hemodynamic impacts of stent-graft stiffness and length on arterial parameters, including PWV, pulse pressure (PP), and distensibility in vitro, and compared these effects with conventional stent-grafts. Stent-graft stiffness significantly affected PWV, PP, and distensibility. Conventional stent-grafts showed 14 %-52 % increase in PWV depending on stent-graft length (p < 0.001), 5 %-32 % increase in PP, and 82 % reduction in mid-graft distensibility. In contrast, NF-SGs maintained PWV and PP near baseline levels with marginal effect of the stent-graft length. Distensibility in the mid-graft was reduced by 13 %-20 %, depending on the stent-graft length. The NF-SG's superior compliance and reduced hemodynamic perturbation were attributed to its mechanically optimized fabric and skeleton design. These findings underscore the clinical potential of the compliant stent-grafts to significantly mitigate long-term cardiovascular complications and preserve aortic functionality post-intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.