ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2026
Physician-level variability in adopting opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention at the time of hysterectomy.
Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Opportunistic salpingectomy reduces ovarian cancer risk. To examine heterogeneity among physicians in their adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy in hysterectomy practice, we identified 33,401 non-pregnant patients aged 18 to 49 years in the Premier Healthcare Database who underwent inpatient hysterectomy for benign indications without oophorectomy in 2011-2021 (operated on by 1297 physicians). Opportunistic salpingectomy was measured by procedure codes reflecting bilateral complete removal of fallopian tubes. Even after adjusting for patient age, surgical route, indication, overweight/obesity, smoking status, and co-morbidities, opportunistic salpingectomy use varied widely among physicians. A finite mixture model identified 2 distinct adoption patterns among physicians: 1 exhibiting low adoption (average risk-adjusted rate of opportunistic salpingectomy increased from 0.01% in 2011 to 43.3% in 2021) and the other exhibiting high adoption (10.5% in 2011 to 81.3% in 2021). They accounted for 39.3% and 60.7% of the physicians, respectively. Physicians at teaching hospitals or in the northeast or west were more likely, whereas physicians having more Medicaid patients were less likely, to follow a high-adoption pattern. Physicians' adoption patterns did not differ by hysterectomy volume, hospital size, urban/rural location, or composition of their patients' race/ethnicity and marital status. These results highlight variation among physicians in their level and speed of adopting opportunistic salpingectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.