ArticleThe Gerontologist2026
Historical change in midlife trajectories of self-reported sensory functioning across 16 nations.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesProblems with vision or hearing in midlife and old age can have a detrimental impact on individuals' autonomy in everyday life, social participation, and quality of life. However, little is known about historical trends in self-reported vision and hearing trajectories among middle-aged adults and how these differ across nations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThe researchers used harmonized data (n = 96,896; data collection 1996-2020) on self-reported near and distant vision as well as hearing from nationally representative panel surveys across a total of 16 countries (United States, Mexico, South Korea, England, and countries in Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic Europe) in order to compare historical change in middle-aged adults' sensory functioning trajectories. The researchers included sex, age, education, chronic conditions, and depressive symptoms as moderators of historical change.
resultsLongitudinal multilevel regression models revealed that at age 50 and across most birth year cohorts, U.S. individuals had poorer self-reported near and distant vision than individuals in England and Continental Europe. For the United States, there was no evidence of historical change in self-reported hearing and distant vision. Across most countries, including the United States, there was a historical decline in self-reported near vision. Women reported better hearing than men; this sex discrepancy narrowed across historical time. Education and depressive symptoms were more closely associated with self-reported sensory functioning in the United States than in most other regions. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings of this study suggest that there is little evidence for global historical improvements in self-reported sensory functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.