ArticleMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2026
Deep learning-based approach for differential diagnosis of odontogenic cysts from histopathological images.
Article in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning approach for the diagnosis and recurrence prediction of OKC.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for the detection and diagnosis of oral and maxillofacial lesions: evidence, limitations, and future directions.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to provide Deep Learning (DL) based artificial intelligence (AI) methods using histopathology images to diagnose different types of odontogenic cysts (OCs) differentially. MATERIAL AND
methodsWithin the scope of the proposed study, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained images of 3 different cyst groups were used. The dataset consists of histopathology images of 87 Dentigerous cysts (DC), 198 radicular cyst (RC), and 63 odontogenic keratocyst (OKC). Each image was zoomed with 3 different zoom levels and resized to 224x224 as preprocessing. In addition to the classical CNN method, Inception V3, VGG16, VGG19, and Xception architectures were used. The data set was split into training, validation, and test groups to avoid retesting.
resultsThe average accuracy, precision, sensitivity (recall), and F1-Score values obtained for CNN were 0.77, 0.80, 0.77, 0.75, and for VGG16 were 0.89, 0.90, 0.89, 0.89. For VGG19, these values were determined as 0.89, 0.90, 0.89, and 0.88, for Xception, these values were determined as 0.62, 0.52, 0.62,and 0.52 and for Inception, these values were determined as 0.62, 0.62, 0.62 and 0.56.
conclusionsIt was observed that VGG16 and VGG19 models showed superior performance on the data set in question, while Xception and Inception V3 models converged slower, meaning the training process progressed slower. Results showed that deep neural networks can be efficiently used in detecting OCs. AI-based OC detection may be a decision support tool that reduces interprofessional variability, expedites the diagnostic process, and lessens clinician workload.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.