Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273702›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-Based Approaches for Genetic Damage Prediction.

Abhishek Tripathi, Alisha, Riya, K Sriram, N Arul Murugan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhishek TripathiDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
AlishaDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
RiyaDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
K SriramDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
N Arul MuruganDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India. arul.murugan@iiitd.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic toxicology is a scientific discipline investigating the impact of deleterious physical and chemical agents on the inheritance process. Genotoxic cellular processes such as chromosomal abnormalities, micronuclei production, sister chromatid exchanges, and cell death contribute to the development of numerous adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which ultimately lead to carcinogenic and mutagenic effects. Recently, there have been instances where drugs used to treat a specific disease have been found to induce genotoxicity in humans. This chapter concentrates on categorizing various assays like the Ames test, which can quantify the degree of genotoxic damage. Furthermore, the studies on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches used to predict genetic damage are elaborated. In the context of genotoxicity prediction, AI models are typically categorized into three main types: Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR), Machine Learning (ML), and Deep Learning (DL). Additionally, a detailed datasheet is made available for the models, studies, and research that specifically focus on genotoxicity prediction. Researchers have used a wide range of molecular descriptors and fingerprints for the predictions, including topological, electrostatic, and intricate quantum descriptors. This chapter provides a fundamental overview of genotoxicity, including its prediction using various tools and software and its evaluation using prediction scores and different metrics. These advancements, as a whole, encourage the use of AI models to assess genotoxicity and more accurately predict potential genotoxic risks in the drug development process.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDNA DamageMachine LearningMutagensHumansMutagenicity TestsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipSoftwareMutagensAmes testArtificial intelligenceDeep learningGenetic damageGenotoxic drugsGenotoxicity predictionMachine learningQSAR

Identifiers

PMID41273702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.