Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273701›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

In Silico Approaches in Predictive Genetic Toxicology.

Meetali Sinha, Tanya Jamal, Alok Dhawan, R Parthasarathi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meetali SinhaREACT - Computational Toxicology Group, CSIR - Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Vishvigyan Bhavan, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tanya JamalREACT - Computational Toxicology Group, CSIR - Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Vishvigyan Bhavan, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Alok DhawanCentre of BioMedical Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
R ParthasarathiREACT - Computational Toxicology Group, CSIR - Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Vishvigyan Bhavan, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. partha.ram@iitr.res.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In silico toxicology methods facilitate clear interpretation of the observed experimental genetic toxicity trends and provide faster, more economical, and animal-free tools for the benefit of environmental and human health in conjunction with other relevant in vitro and in vivo methods. Regulatory agencies are emphasizing the use of computational approaches to predict genetic toxicity to reduce the use of animals in toxicity testing of chemicals. Combination of in vivo (existing data), in vitro, high-throughput, and content screening data together with computational predictions might improve the predictive confidence in the genotoxicity assessment. This is an immensely difficult task, and twenty-first-century toxicology will not become animal-free overnight but is likely to use relevant and reliable computational approaches that will evolve and adapt to best use these scientific and technological advances. Expert-based, statistical QSAR models, and read-across are the most commonly used computational methodologies, and each predictive model adheres to the OECD QSAR validation principle along with an expert review system to conclude. The key steps involved in the in silico genotoxicity prediction are identification of the problem, data collection, generation of chemical descriptors, construction of the Q/SAR model, internal/external validation of the model, statistical evaluation of the models, and optimization of modeling parameters to further enhance SAR performance, updating a validated model with new chemical sets and finally reporting and documentation of the complete study. This chapter describes various in silico toxicology approaches and standardized protocols for conducting genetic toxicity predictions of chemicals and also highlights various parameters for the validation of the prediction results obtained from QSAR models.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyComputer SimulationMutagensToxicologyAnimalsHumansMutagenicity TestsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipMutagensExpert-based systemsGenotoxicityIn silicoPredictive toxicologyQSARStatistical performanceToxicology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.