Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273682›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

In Vivo Micronucleus and Chromosomal Aberration Assays in Mouse Bone Marrow.

Sneha Verma, Shambhavi Jha, Richa Singh, Alok Kumar Pandey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sneha VermaNanomaterial Toxicology Laboratory, NaMaSTE Group (FEST Division), CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shambhavi JhaNanomaterial Toxicology Laboratory, NaMaSTE Group (FEST Division), CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Richa SinghNanomaterial Toxicology Laboratory, NaMaSTE Group (FEST Division), CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Alok Kumar PandeyNanomaterial Toxicology Laboratory, NaMaSTE Group (FEST Division), CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. alok.kumar09@csir.res.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of genotoxic agents in the environment may cause chromosomal mutations through different mechanisms, which are associated with serious health effects. Tests that help to determine irreversible genetic abnormalities and those that offer indirect proof of DNA damage are both included in genotoxicity testing, which are used to discover chemicals that affect genetic material. Since individual tests do not reveal all the end points, a panel of tests is typically thought to be the most thorough way to assess a chemical's capacity to cause genotoxicity. A commonly used and well-known assay in genetic toxicology for determining the genotoxic potential of chemical substances, medications, and environmental variables are the in vivo micronucleus (MN) and chromosomal aberration (CA) test in bone marrow (BM). These in vivo cytogenetic tests use bone marrow of rodents to ascertain chemical damage to the chromosomes or mitotic apparatus of mammalian cells and examine via microscopy. An increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MN PCEs) and aberrant chromosomes in treated animals is an indication of genotoxicity. This chapter offers a concise overview of the widely utilized fundamental tests and their protocols used for regulatory purposes.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowChromosome AberrationsAnimalsBone Marrow CellsDNA DamageMiceMicronucleus TestsMutagenicity TestsMutagensMutagensBone marrowChromosomal aberrationGiemsa stainIn vivo CAIn vivo MNMay-Grunwald stainMetaphaseMicronucleusNCEsNormochromatic erythrocytesPCEsPolychromatic erythrocytes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.