ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Volumetric MRI assessment of perirenal hematoma following biopsy of native and transplanted kidneys.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to "Methodological pitfalls in MRI‑based quantification of post‑biopsy perirenal hematomas".International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Methodological pitfalls in MRI-based quantification of post-biopsy perirenal hematomas.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy: Free-hand versus puncture attachment.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is the gold standard for diagnosing nephropathies but carries a risk of complications, most commonly perirenal hematoma (PH). Although usually minor, PH volume is rarely quantified, and ultrasound-the standard modality-has limited accuracy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables precise volumetric assessment and may improve understanding of PH pathophysiology. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 138 patients (104 with native kidneys, 34 with grafts) who underwent kidney MRI 36-48 h after PRB. PHs were manually segmented on T1-weighted Dixon water-only images. Predictors of large PHs (upper tertile of volume) were identified using logistic regression, and model stability was evaluated with leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). As an exploratory analysis, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were obtained from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) maps to assess correlations between renal diffusivity and PH volume.
resultsPH was detected in 89.9% of cases. Median PH volume was significantly lower in grafts than in native kidneys (9.3 mL vs. 20.95 mL, p = 0.030). Graft status was an independent negative predictor of large PH, while kidney volume (KV), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and proteinuria were independent positive predictors. The final model showed moderate discriminative performance (AUC = 0.708). Lower ADC values correlated moderately and negatively with PH volume (rho = -0.41, p = 0.009).
conclusionMRI volumetry enables precise assessment of PH after PRB. Larger KV, higher DBP and proteinuria predicted greater PH volume, while graft status was protective. Lower renal parenchymal ADC values may reflect microstructural alterations predisposing to increased PH volume but warrants further evaluation in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.