Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273626›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2025

The Goal Attainment Scale in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: Exploration of Feasibility and Content Validity.

Kristofoor E Leeuwenberg, Roderick P P W M Maas, Bart P van de Warrenburg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristofoor E LeeuwenbergDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, GA, 6525, the Netherlands. Kris.e.leeuwenberg@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2204-308X
Roderick P P W M MaasDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, GA, 6525, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-1287
Bart P van de WarrenburgDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, GA, 6525, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4412-1616

Funding

SIMPATHIC (Horizon Europe Program) 101080249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in therapeutic development in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) underscores the need for trial readiness and outcome measures that accurately reflect patient-relevant disease progression. The Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) has been proposed to capture interindividual variability within a unified, patient-centered metric. However, concerns about its feasibility and clinimetric properties have limited its use in clinical trials so far. This exploratory study assesses the feasibility and content validity of the GAS interview in SCA3. The GAS interview was conducted by a single assessor in 15 SCA3 patients at varying disease stages. Feasibility metrics and the content of goals, categorized according to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains, were evaluated. For each patient, at least three goals were successfully set within the planned timeframe, averaging 9.2 min per goal. The presence of a caregiver was considered important for ensuring goal quality in patients with severe cognitive impairment. Most goals were related to balance issues (30.2%), followed by coordination of limb movements (11.1%) and visual function (11.1%). Balance-related goals were consistently ranked as most important by patients across all disease stages. Our findings support the feasibility and content validity of the GAS interview in SCA3, with goal content deemed relevant from both patient and clinician perspectives. The next step is to implement the GAS in a trial setting, accompanied by an evaluation of its clinimetric properties within that context.

Indexed as

GoalsMachado-Joseph DiseaseAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexContent validityFeasibilityGoal attainment scaleOutcome measureSpinocerebellar ataxia type 3

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.