ArticleDiscover nano2025
A simple and user-friendly protocol for chitosan nanoparticle synthesis.
Article in Discover nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A Simple Ionic-Gelation Method for Chitosan Nanoparticle Synthesis and Standardized Protocols for Biological Safety Assessment: Antibacterial Activity, Phytotoxicity, and Biocompatibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biosynthesis of Magnetite Nanoparticles Mediated by Chia Mucilage and Its Co-Encapsulation withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Correction: A simple and user-friendly protocol for chitosan nanoparticle synthesis.Discover nano · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs), a simple, cost-effective, and reproducible synthesis protocol remains a critical unmet need. Existing protocols for ionic gelation methods are often laborious, requiring overnight stirring, costly filtration, and time-consuming lyophilization. In this study, we present a novel, easy-to-adopt, cost-effective, scalable, and highly reproducible protocol for synthesizing CNPs via ionic gelation, bypassing these common drawbacks. Our method standardizes the use of low molecular weight chitosan (0.1%) stabilized with Tween 80 in 1% acetic acid solution, crosslinked with sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP) in 3:1 volume ratio to form CNPs. The CNPs are efficiently separated using simple centrifugation, eliminating the need for complex and expensive lyophilization. The nanoparticles obtained were systematically characterized for their physicochemical and structural properties, including particle size, zeta potential, polydispersity index, morphology, functional groups, crystallinity, and elemental composition, using a wide range of analytical techniques such as UV-Vis spectroscopy, Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Energy-Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDAX), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), and High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM). Comprehensive characterization of synthesized CNPs consistently demonstrated the formation of well-defined, spherical amorphous nanoparticles within the nanometer range, exhibiting a positive surface charge, presence of functional groups, and desirable elemental composition. The protocol's simplicity, low cost, scalability, accessibility, and reproducibility of the synthesized CNPs make it a significant advancement for researchers in various fields. Given their inherent biocompatibility and functional versatility, these CNPs are highly promising for a wide range of applications, including antimicrobial coatings, food preservation, water treatment, drug delivery, and sustainable agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.