ArticleCJEM2026
Pediatric addictions and mental health boarding in emergency departments: a scoping review.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEmergency departments (EDs) have seen growing rates of pediatric mental health presentations, a trend exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these patients will 'board', remaining in the ED for prolonged periods of time while awaiting transfer to an inpatient bed. Boarding disproportionately impacts mental health patients and is associated with worse patient health outcomes and healthcare system inefficiency. The objective of this scoping review is to synthesize the extent and nature of evidence relating to pediatric mental health boarding, and to identify knowledge gaps.
methodsSearches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed literature involving mental health patients boarding in hospital EDs. Studies underwent eligibility screening for pediatric populations and data extraction by two reviewers. Results are reported per PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
resultsThree thousand four hundred and fifty-eight studies were screened for title and abstract eligibility, 386 of which were assessed at full-text. Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 19 assessed variables impacting boarding, 18 quantified boarding duration or prevalence, 6 measured the impacts of boarding, 5 assessed interventions to mitigate boarding, and 4 provided consensus recommendations. Eighty-two percent of studies were published within the last 5 years and all are from the United States. Reported mean ED boarding times ranged from 5 to 54 h across 5 studies. Of 7 studies assessing the impact of COVID-19 on pediatric mental health boarding, all reported that COVID-19 was associated with increased boarding prevalence and/or duration.
conclusionsAn emerging body of literature on the burden and impacts of ED boarding among pediatric mental health patients suggests that boarding is a pressing concern in the delivery of pediatric emergency healthcare that has worsened since COVID-19. This is the most comprehensive evidence synthesis on pediatric mental health boarding to date, highlighting the impacts of boarding and the solutions studied to address this problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41273596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.