Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273513›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Enantioselective Analysis of Chiral Agrochemicals with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

Lorenzo Antonelli, Massimo Giuseppe De Cesaris, Nina Felli, Chiara Dal Bosco, Alessandra Gentili

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorenzo AntonelliDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Massimo Giuseppe De CesarisDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Nina FelliDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Chiara Dal BoscoDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra GentiliDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. alessandra.gentili@uniroma1.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the versatility of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chiral separation techniques to analyze chiral agrochemicals, often applied as racemic mixtures, and useful mathematical tools for the evaluation of stereoisomer degradation routes in the environment. Among the several chiral stationary phases, polysaccharide-based carbamate- or ester-functionalized ones are the most popular and effective, both in terms of enantioselectivity and chemoselectivity, proving to be potent analytical tools for studying chiral pesticides. In recent years, the tendency promoted by the European policies has led to the development of agrochemical formulations containing a single active enantiomer. The actual purity of such preparations and the degradation pathways of the involved chiral species can be studied through the procedures described here. In this perspective, enantioselective analyses allow one to verify the quality of the commercialized products and the degradation processes of involved stereoisomers in environmental and food samples. As a model analytical workflow, an enantioselective chromatographic method for the detection and quantitative assessment of quizalofop-ethyl and quizalofop, a post-emergence herbicide and its main metabolite, respectively, is presented here. The analytical procedure aims at following the chiral signature of these contaminants in the environmental sector, giving tools for the investigation of dispersive dynamics and natural degradation pathways of chiral species.

Indexed as

AgrochemicalsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidStereoisomerismAgrochemicalsChiral pesticidesChiral separationChromatographic fractionationEnvironmental analysisPolysaccharide-based chiral columns

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.