ArticleOdontology2026
Optical and surface characteristics of additively manufactured resin composite following immersion in functional beverages: a layer thickness-based comparison.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an immune-enhancing vitamin C beverage and natural orange juice on the optical properties and surface roughness of an additively manufactured resin composite fabricated with different print layer thicknesses. Ninety disc-shaped specimens (12 × 2 mm) were printed from a resin composite (Bego VarseoSmile TriniQ) at 25-µm, 50-µm, and 100-µm layer thicknesses (n = 10 per subgroup) with a 90° build orientation. Initial relative translucency parameter (RTP), color (T0), and surface roughness (Ra) were measured. Specimens were then immersed for 72 h in either a vitamin C beverage (Mucovit C; pH 2.2-2.5), natural orange juice (pH 2.9-4.0), or distilled water. Post-immersion measurements (T1) were compared using two-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD, one-way ANOVA, and paired t-tests (α = .05). At baseline, RTP was significantly higher for 25-µm compared to 100-µm specimens in the distilled water group (P = .006). After immersion, only the 25-µm group showed a significant RTP reduction (P = .024). Ra increased significantly in the 25-µm group after exposure to both acidic solutions (P < .05). Color change (ΔE₀₀) varied by thickness in orange juice (P = .037) and the vitamin C drink (P = .002), with 50-µm specimens showing the highest discoloration. No significant differences were found in distilled water or between beverage types (P > .05). Thinner print layers enhanced initial translucency, but were more prone to surface roughening and discoloration after acidic exposure, highlighting a trade-off in esthetic durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41273499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.