ArticleBiological trace element research2026
Proteomic Signatures of Dental Enamel Hypomineralization: Divergent Molecular Pathways in Coal-Burning vs. Drinking-Water Fluorosis.
Article in Biological trace element research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exposure to excessive fluoride can lead to dental enamel hypomineralization, which is characterized by the retention of enamel matrix proteins (EMPs). However, the types and functions of EMPs from different fluoride exposure routes remain elusive. In this study, moderate-to-severe coal-burning dental fluorosis enamel (CDF), drinking-water dental fluorosis enamel (WDF) and healthy permanent dental enamel (H) were obtained from the teeth of residents (local until age 12). The EMPs were extracted, digested, and analyzed via nanoLC-HRMS/MS, followed by database searching and bioinformatics; 404, 100, and 293 unique proteins were identified in CDF, WDF and H, respectively. Compared with WDF and H, CDF exhibited the expression of more specific proteins and upregulated proteins. Compared with H, both WDF and CDF upregulated S100 calcium-binding protein and ECM-receptor interactions pathways, but CDF upregulated the expression of more proteins related to calcium ions and serine proteinase inhibitors. Interestingly, compared with H, CDF uniquely activated the Ras signaling pathway and the glycolysis and gluconeogenesis pathways, while TGF-β/Wnt pathways (β-catenin-linked) distinguished CDF from WDF. The proteomic comparisons reveal the effects of fluoride exposure on enamel proteomic signatures, and aid in understanding the essential characteristics and molecular-level differences underlying enamel damage caused by different exposure routes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41273490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.