Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273467›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2026

Dancing together in virtual space: experiential and agentive dimensions of perceptual crossing support microactivities and dynamic embodiment in social cognition.

Johannes Wagemann, Leonardo Zapata-Fonseca, Stephen Estelle, Tom Froese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes WagemannInstitute for Waldorf Education, Inclusion and Interculturalism, Alanus University, Campus Mannheim, Am Exerzierplatz 21, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany. johannes.wagemann@alanus.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-9975
Leonardo Zapata-FonsecaEmbodied Cognitive Science Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Okinawa, Japan.
Stephen EstelleEmbodied Cognitive Science Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Okinawa, Japan.
Tom FroeseEmbodied Cognitive Science Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Okinawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Perceptual Crossing Paradigm (PCP) is one of the most radical settings in social cognition research, as it confines dyadic encounter to one-dimensional movements in a virtual space and haptic feedback via human-computer interfaces. While the PCP has already led to insightful results in different settings and populations, the first-person perspective of participants on their experience and agency has not yet been systematically investigated. However, to understand the precise mechanisms by which test partners interact and identify each other, and the role that embodiment plays in this, behavioral data must be complemented by qualitative first-person data. Therefore, our PCP study (N=54) included open-ended self-reports collected over six trials which were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach using qualitative coding and different forms of quantification and statistical tests. Qualitatively, the 62 codes organized in hierarchical levels provide a fine-grained picture of individual experience (e.g., fourteen emotions) and interindividual aspects of agency (action phases, proactive and receptive microactivities originating from both partners). Unexpectedly, in quantitative regard, code frequencies of all four microactivities were significantly higher in this minimalistic setting compared to other social cognition studies with more natural settings. And their distribution across the action phases (intention, action execution, evaluation) yielded a significant pattern that can be explained by differentiating physical and mental actions as stronger and weaker forms of embodiment, supporting a dynamically embodied concept of social interaction.

Indexed as

DancingInterpersonal RelationsPsychomotor PerformanceSocial CognitionSocial InteractionSpace PerceptionVirtual RealityAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleUser-Computer InterfaceYoung AdultAction phasesEmbodimentFirst-person methodologyMicroactivitiesSocial cognitionSocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID41273467
PMCPMC13156100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.