ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2025
Evaluating Pretrained Protein Language Model Embeddings as Proxies for Functional Similarity.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein Language Model Embeddings Recover Evolutionary and Functional Organization Across the Ras Superfamily.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Protein Language Model Embeddings Reveal Proteome-Scale Ortholog Divergence Relevant to Cross-Species Pharmacology.Proteomes · 2026Article
- PRIME: An evaluation framework for protein representation inference and generalization in viral mutation space.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Review
- Perspectives on Orthology During the Quest for Orthologs.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein Language Models (PLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for representing protein sequences. We explore how embeddings (numeric vector representations) from pretrained PLMs can serve as direct numeric proxies for protein structure and function without requiring additional training or fine-tuning. In a proof-of-concept study of 22 cross-species complementation triplets-a gold standard for functional similarity where genes from one species are tested for their ability to rescue gene deletions in another species-we find that ESM-C 600 M embeddings summarized into pooled sliced-Wasserstein embeddings achieved high discrimination of subtle functional differences. This pooling method captures distributional properties of amino acid embeddings by comparing them against reference points using optimal transport theory. While our limited sample size precludes definitive conclusions about whether PLM embeddings systematically outperform sequence-based methods in detecting protein functional similarity, our preliminary results demonstrate the potential of using protein embeddings for functional analysis. Our exploratory analysis of orthology relationships suggests that embedding similarity may correlate with functional conservation, with the least diverged ortholog showing higher embedding similarity in approximately two-thirds of cases. Analyzing the Ortholog Conjecture-that orthologs maintain greater functional similarity than paralogs at equivalent sequence divergence-we do not observe clear differences between one-to-one orthologs and inparalog embedding similarities. Finally, we propose integrating PLMs with phylogenetic methods in a hybrid approach that leverages their complementary strengths: PLM-derived numeric embeddings for rapid homology detection and phylogenetics for evolutionary precision. We introduce embedding-tree versus gene-tree discordance as a potential metric to detect functional divergence between closely related proteins. Integrating protein embeddings with sequence analysis may enable a more nuanced understanding of protein function and evolutionary dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.