ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Oncologists' current perspective and barriers to men's fertility preservation: a nationwide study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing prevalence of cancer survivors has made fertility preservation (FP) a key concern. Oncologists play a pivotal role in initiating FP discussions, safeguarding patients' potential for future fatherhood, and ultimately contributing to their long-term quality of life. Although understanding methods of fertility preservation is essential, the literature on this topic is scarce within the Saudi population. Therefore, this study assessed oncologists' understanding, attitudes, practices, and barriers toward fertility preservation for cancer patients.
methodsA nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted among oncologists from various subspecialties in Saudi Arabia using an online self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised sociodemographic data, knowledge, current practices, barriers, attitudes, and perceptions to fertility preservation.
resultsA total of 76 oncologists participated in this study. Only 40.8% had received fertility preservation training, and 85.5% expressed a need for additional training. At the same time, 38.2% reported the availability of preservation services at their institutions; access to FP services varied by geographic location. Although 57.9% of oncologists regularly discussed fertility preservation with patients, only 18.4% consistently referred them to fertility specialists. Moreover, significant knowledge gaps, particularly regarding testicular tissue cryopreservation, were reported. Lastly, barriers to fertility preservation included limited access to services, insufficient knowledge, concerns about oncology treatment delays, and the lack of structured referral systems.
conclusionsThis study reveals significant gaps in oncologists' knowledge, training, and practices regarding fertility preservation, particularly sperm cryopreservation. Targeted training and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential to enhance the accessibility of fertility preservation and ensure its proper integration into oncology care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41273403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.