ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
Mapping the neurocognitive landscape of pediatric Chiari malformation type I: a scoping review of the literature.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to advancements in neuroimaging, Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) has become more widely recognized in pediatric populations. While its neurological manifestations are well documented, research on its neurocognitive impact remains limited and poorly characterized. This scoping review facilitates a comprehensive mapping of the current evidence, identifies the neurocognitive domains most frequently assessed, evaluates the extent of available evidence regarding surgical outcomes, and highlights critical knowledge gaps. The most frequently examined domains were working memory, executive function, language, and attention. Parental reports commonly indicated executive dysfunction, particularly within metacognitive processes. Evidence linking surgical decompression to improvements in neurocognitive function was inconsistent, and most studies lacked baseline or longitudinal assessments. Across studies, substantial methodological heterogeneity and variable use of validated instruments limited cross-comparison. Current evidence on the neurocognitive sequelae of pediatric CM-I is fragmented and methodologically diverse. The findings underscore the need for standardized neurocognitive assessments at diagnosis, the use of validated pediatric instruments, and prospective, longitudinal research integrating clinical, neuroimaging, and neurocognitive data to clarify the developmental impact of CM-I and its management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41273363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.