ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Postural control in humans: a study using transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurosensory Integration and Balance Adaptation: Personalization of Postural Control Through the Prism of Individual Spatial Perception.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Postural control in humans: a study using transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the spinal mechanisms involved in regulating postural balance in humans. Participants stood in a normal stance, with their spinal postural networks either non-invasively activated or not stimulated by electrical stimulation. Postural sway, muscle activity, joint kinematics and respiratory movements were monitored. Half of the participants depended on external sensory cues for controlling balance (field dependent), whereas the other half did not (field independent). Stimulation was performed at the T11-T12 or L1-L2 vertebral level using intensities below the motor threshold. When participants stood without stimulation, differences in body segment movement in the frontal plane were observed between subgroups, in addition to similarities in segment movement in the sagittal plane. Field-dependent participants demonstrated greater mediolateral sway and pelvic motion and relied more on hip involvement in frontal centre of pressure dynamics than field-independent participants. Stimulation at T11-T12 induced changes in muscle activity and body segment coordination in both groups. It led to a reduction in mediolateral sway and enhanced postural stability, but only in field-dependent individuals. Stimulation at L1-L2 altered muscle activity and joint kinematics in both subgroups without having an effect on postural stability. Stimulation did not affect respiratory movements or posture-respiratory coupling. In the human spinal cord, the interneuronal networks involved in postural regulation are located at the T11-T12 level and operate under supraspinal control. Interneuronal networks at the L1-L2 level also modulate muscle activity and body segment coordination; however, their specific role in regulating upright posture remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.