Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273245›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2026

Validation of OSLER Test Against Maintenance of Wakefulness Test and the Association With Subjective Measures of Sleepiness.

Riikka Huhta, Anniina Alakuijala, Markku Partinen

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Riikka HuhtaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki Clinicum Unit, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7360-4065
Anniina AlakuijalaDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Markku PartinenDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki Clinicum Unit, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Finnish Sleep Research SocietyFinnish Traffic Medicine FoundationHenry Ford FoundationMaire Taponen FoundationResearch Foundation of the Pulmonary DiseasesThe Finnish Work Environment Fund 114074Väinö and Laina Kivi Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to stay awake is crucial in life and can be compromised by insufficient sleep and medical conditions. Measuring alertness is important for evaluating driving ability and the Oxford Sleep Resistance (OSLER) test may provide an easy way for assessment. The study population included 40 professional truck drivers who participated in the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) between 2000 and 2002. Half of these subjects had sleep latency less than 33 min in the MWT. All subjects completed a questionnaire, underwent interviews, participated in both the MWT and OSLER test on consecutive days and filled in the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) before each MWT and OSLER test session. Altogether, 39 subjects successfully completed both the MWT and OSLER test in random order. The MWT took place after polysomnography. The mean sleep latency in the MWT was 38.7 min while the mean sleep latency in the OSLER test was 38.9 min. If the sleep latency in the OSLER test exceeded 33 min, it was highly likely that the sleep latency in the MWT would also be normal (> 33 min). The OSLER test appears to be a reliable objective measure for assessing the ability to stay awake in professional drivers and is easier to administer than the MWT, which still remains the gold standard.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingWakefulnessAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyReproducibility of ResultsSleepSleepinessSleep LatencySurveys and QuestionnairesalertnessMWTOSLER testprofessional driverssleepinessvigilance (max 6kpl)

Identifiers

PMID41273245
PMCPMC13193355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.