ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2025
Novel Resistance Mechanisms to Second-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Afatinib and Associations With Genomic Features in NSCLC.
Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel Resistance Mechanisms to Second-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Afatinib and Associations With Genomic Features in NSCLC.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAfatinib, an irreversible pan-ERBB family inhibitor, has demonstrated promising efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with uncommon EGFR activating mutations. However, besides the acquisition of the secondary T790M mutation, other resistance mechanisms to afatinib remain to be explored. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study retrospectively included 37 NSCLC patients harboring either EGFR or ERBB2 activating mutations, who had received afatinib as first-line treatment. Targeted next-generation sequencing data on the baseline and post-progression samples were subjected to analysis. Comparative analyses of clinical parameters and genomic features were performed.
resultsOverall, the progression-free survival of the EGFR-mutated patients on first-line afatinib was longer than that of the ERBB2-positive patients (hazard ratio = 0.35 [95% confidence interval = 0.15-0.79], p = 0.008). Primary resistance was associated with the presence of exon 20 insertion mutation (p = 0.011), higher tumor mutational burden (p = 0.009), and higher proportion of APOBEC signature (p = 0.012), which were all enriched in the ERBB2-mutated cohort. We further characterized acquired resistance to afatinib and discovered that baseline EGFR exon 19 deletions and higher levels of chromosomal instability and age-related mutational signatures would contribute to the development of known resistance mechanisms such as EGFR T790M or MET amplification. We also report gaining EGFR activating mutations and losing CDKN2A, NF1, or the original ERBB2 mutations as novel resistance mechanisms to afatinib for ERBB2-mutated patients.
conclusionThe study identified multiple genomic characteristics associated with primary and secondary resistance to first-line afatinib treatment in EGFR- and ERBB2-positive subpopulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.