ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025
Starch-Based Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production: Challenges and Perspectives.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Starch-Based Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production: Challenges and Perspectives.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advancement of cultured meat depends on the development of structures that combine biological compatibility, edibility, sensory acceptance, and large-scale feasibility. In this context, starch emerges as an abundant, low-cost, and food-grade biopolymer, uniquely positioned for applications in food systems. Although widely studied in biomedical contexts, its specific role in cultured meat remains underexplored, despite advantages such as regulatory acceptance, consumer familiarity, and global availability. Unlike reviews focused on biomaterials for medical applications, this work centers on starch-based structures applied to food biofabrication, considering not only the physicochemical, rheological, and structural aspects of native and modified forms, but also their performance in relation to requirements specific to the food industry. The main commercial starch sources, corn, cassava, potato, wheat, and rice, are discussed according to their relevance in global production and the availability of experimental data. The review further emphasizes processing routes such as extrusion, freeze-drying, and 3D bioprinting, highlighting how these methods define the architecture, mechanical properties, and biofunctionality of starch matrices. The analysis balances benefits, including cost-effectiveness, safety, and edibility, with limitations, particularly the low capacity of starch alone to promote cell adhesion. Moreover, it distinguishes results obtained from strictly biomedical studies from those that effectively contribute to food-grade applications. Finally, industrial perspectives are discussed, including scalability, bioreactor integration, and technoeconomic aspects, positioning starch not merely as an alternative but as a strategic foundation for the design of edible scaffolds in the emerging field of food biofabrication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.