Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273204›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025

Starch-Based Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production: Challenges and Perspectives.

Cristiane Silvano Wensing, German Ayala Valencia, Edna Regina Amante, Mark Post, Silvani Verruck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Starch-Based Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production: Challenges and Perspectives.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cristiane Silvano WensingGraduate Program in Food Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
German Ayala ValenciaGraduate Program in Food Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9824-4510
Edna Regina AmanteGraduate Program in Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Mark PostMosa Meat B.V., Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Silvani VerruckGraduate Program in Food Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0266-5885

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement of cultured meat depends on the development of structures that combine biological compatibility, edibility, sensory acceptance, and large-scale feasibility. In this context, starch emerges as an abundant, low-cost, and food-grade biopolymer, uniquely positioned for applications in food systems. Although widely studied in biomedical contexts, its specific role in cultured meat remains underexplored, despite advantages such as regulatory acceptance, consumer familiarity, and global availability. Unlike reviews focused on biomaterials for medical applications, this work centers on starch-based structures applied to food biofabrication, considering not only the physicochemical, rheological, and structural aspects of native and modified forms, but also their performance in relation to requirements specific to the food industry. The main commercial starch sources, corn, cassava, potato, wheat, and rice, are discussed according to their relevance in global production and the availability of experimental data. The review further emphasizes processing routes such as extrusion, freeze-drying, and 3D bioprinting, highlighting how these methods define the architecture, mechanical properties, and biofunctionality of starch matrices. The analysis balances benefits, including cost-effectiveness, safety, and edibility, with limitations, particularly the low capacity of starch alone to promote cell adhesion. Moreover, it distinguishes results obtained from strictly biomedical studies from those that effectively contribute to food-grade applications. Finally, industrial perspectives are discussed, including scalability, bioreactor integration, and technoeconomic aspects, positioning starch not merely as an alternative but as a strategic foundation for the design of edible scaffolds in the emerging field of food biofabrication.

Indexed as

MeatStarchAnimalsBioprintingHumansIn Vitro MeatStarchfood‐grade scaffoldshydrogelsmodified starchesscalabilitysustainable biomaterialstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41273204
PMCPMC12639490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.