SynthesisEuropean journal of neurology2025
Systematic Review of Immune and Symptomatic Treatments for Stiff-Person Syndrome.
Synthesis in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Immune and Symptomatic Treatments for Stiff-Person Syndrome.European journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Stiff Person Syndrome: Bridging Neuroimmunology and Rehabilitation for Improved Patient Outcomes.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Thymoma-associated stiff-person syndrome successfully treated with extended thymectomy: a case report.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases · 2026Article
- Stiff-Person Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Rare Disease with Emphasis on Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, Diagnostic Challenges and Therapeutic Advances.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2026Review
- Individualized repetitive intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for a 79-year-old patient with GlyR antibody-positive PERM: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThis systematic review evaluated the effectiveness and safety of immune and symptomatic treatments in patients with stiff-person syndrome (SPS).
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to September 30, 2024 in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. All studies that involve SPS patients treated with symptomatic pharmacotherapy or immunotherapy and where the outcome is reported were included in the initial screening. Case reports were excluded. Two independent reviewers carried out study selection, bias assessment with the Murad et al. tool for case series, ROBINS-I for observational studies or RoB-2 for randomised trials, and data extraction into a predefined template. All available efficacy and safety data were recorded. A narrative synthesis was conducted to address the heterogeneity of the studies.
resultsThirty-six studies were included. Most of the included studies consisted of small-scale studies, with 21 case series, 10 cohort studies and only five randomised controlled trials. Outcome assessments varied across the reviewed studies. Most studies assessed measures with subjective self-report and/or through clinical observations. Spasms and stiffness were assessed in around 60% of studies. Walking ability and pain were evaluated in less than half of studies. Only 10 (28%) studies assessed functional improvement using a valid and reliable tool. The present review highlights the paucity of data and the heterogeneity in SPS treatment responses and underscores the need for individualised therapeutic strategies.
conclusionsStandardised assessment methods in clinical practice are necessary to benefit understanding and approval of future therapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.