Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273049›Full record

ArticleProteomics2026

Urinary Peptidomic Profiling In Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Case-Control Study.

Dilara Gülmez, Justyna Siwy, Katharina Kurz, Ralph Wendt, Miroslaw Banasik, Björn Peters, Emmanuel Dudoignon, Francois Depret, Mercedes Salgueira, Elena Nowacki and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Dilara GülmezDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Justyna SiwyMosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
Katharina KurzDepartment of Internal Medicine II (Infectious Diseases, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ralph WendtDivision of Nephrology, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
Miroslaw BanasikDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation Medicine and Internal Diseases, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Björn PetersDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Emmanuel DudoignonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital Saint Louis - Lariboisière, AP-HP, Universite Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Francois DepretDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital Saint Louis - Lariboisière, AP-HP, Universite Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Mercedes SalgueiraVirgen Macarena Hospital, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Elena NowackiUniversité Des Patients - Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Amelie KurnikowskiDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sebastian MussnigDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Simon KrennIUVABIT e.U., Analytics & Data Science, Vienna, Austria.
Samuel GonosDepartment of Internal Medicine II (Infectious Diseases, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Judith Löffler-RaggDepartment of Internal Medicine II (Infectious Diseases, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Günter WeissDepartment of Internal Medicine II (Infectious Diseases, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Harald MischakMosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
Manfred HeckingDepartment of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva SchernhammerDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Joachim BeigeDivision of Nephrology, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
UriCoV Working Group

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-22-PERM-0014Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 01KU2309Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG) 2523FSB114Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF) I 6464Land Tirol GZ 75759Land Tirol and the WE&ME Foundation (Stiftung für ME/CFS-Forschung) GZ 86686National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR) PerMed/V/80/UriCov/2023Verket för Innovationssystem (VINNOVA) 2022-00542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-infection (PASC) is challenging to diagnose and treat, and its molecular pathophysiology remains unclear. Urinary peptidomics can provide valuable information on urine peptides that may enable improved and specified PASC diagnosis. Using standardized capillary electrophoresis-MS, we examined the urinary peptidomes of 50 patients with PASC 10 months after COVID-19 and 50 controls, including healthy individuals (n = 42) and patients with non-COVID-19-associated myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) (n = 8). Based on peptide abundance differences between cases and controls, we developed a diagnostic model using a support vector machine. The abundance of 195 urine peptides among PASC patients significantly differed from that in controls, with a predominant abundance of collagen alpha chains. This molecular signature (PASC195) effectively distinguished PASC cases from controls in the training set (AUC of 0.949 [95% CI 0.900-0.998; p < 0.0001]) and independent validation set (AUC of 0.962 [95% CI 0.897-1.00]; p < 0.0001]). In silico assessment suggested exercise, GLP-1RAs and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) as potentially efficacious interventions. We present a novel and non-invasive diagnostic model for PASC. Reflecting its molecular pathophysiology, PASC195 has the potential to advance diagnostics and inform therapeutic interventions. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY: Despite the recent emergence of omics-derived candidates for post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), the pending validation of proposed markers and lack of consensus result in the continuous reliance on symptom-based criteria, being subject to diagnostic uncertainties and potential recall bias. Building upon prior findings of renal involvement in acute COVID-19 pathophysiology and PASC-associated alterations, we hypothesized that the use of urinary peptides for PASC-specific biomarker discovery, unlike conventional specimens that have been utilized thus far, may offer complementary information on putative disease mechanisms. In the present study, 195 significantly expressed peptides were used to form a classifier termed PASC195, which effectively discriminated PASC from non-PASC (p < 0.0001), including healthy individuals and non-COVID-19-associated myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, in both the derivation (n = 60) and an independent validation set (n = 40). The peptidome profile associated with PASC was consistent with a shift in collagen turnover, with most PASC195 peptides derived from alpha chains. Ongoing inflammatory responses, hemostatic imbalances, and endothelial damage were indicated by cross-sectional variations in endogenous peptide excretion.

Indexed as

COVID-19PeptidesAdultAgedBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeProteomicsSARS-CoV-2BiomarkersPeptidesbiomarkermass spectrometryME/CFSPASCurinary peptidomics

Identifiers

PMID41273049
PMCPMC12809007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.