ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Optimization of the Nonclinical Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Using Toxicologic Pathology Best Practices.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of the Nonclinical Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Using Toxicologic Pathology Best Practices.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- A Beginner's Guide to the Annex E Scoring System of ISO 10993-6.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Innovation in the medical device industry is challenging due to the increasing physicochemical, structural, and engineering complexity of devices; proliferation of combination products; advent of long-term implants; and variable approaches to assessing tissue reactions. Nonclinical evaluation of biological responses to implanted devices requires careful study design and implementation of pathology practices to obtain the best data for translating device-related tissue reactions ("toxicity") and associated procedure-induced effects to predict possible outcomes in human patients. This paper outlines optimal pathology practices and related regulatory considerations that frame the nonclinical interpretation of biological responses induced by medical devices and combination products. These pathology practices have been developed by expert pathologists with extensive experience in medical device evaluation to address current guidance found in existing ISO Series standards, regulatory documents, and globally accepted "best practice" recommendations for toxicologic pathology assessment of therapeutic entities. Accordingly, the practices in this paper provide an optimized framework for biological evaluation of tissue responses to medical devices and combination products (both degradable and permanent devices) that should improve the relevance and utility of animal safety data provided to health authorities for human risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.