Trial reportPsycho-oncology2025
The Experience of Women With Breast or Gynecological Cancer After Participation in an Online Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (e-MBCR) Program: Secondary Outcomes Analysis of a Pilot Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04564768 (Online Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Online Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) Program for Patients Living With a Gynecological Cancer: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) are recognized as beneficial in oncology supportive care. While qualitative analyses of mindfulness program experiences exist, this is the first mixed methods study to examine patients' experiences after participating in the online Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (e-MBCR) program.
methodsThe SERENITY study was a pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating the early implementation, and effects of the e-MBCR program for women with breast or gynecological cancer in a French-speaking context. This article reports on secondary outcomes from a mixed methods analysis, exploring psychosocial aspects through questionnaires and participants' experiences through interviews. Sixty-two patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio. Quantitative assessments were carried out at three timepoints; qualitative interviews only post-intervention. Both datasets were analyzed separately, then merged for interpretation.
resultsThe intervention group showed a significant reduction in depression compared to the control group, with a medium effect size post-intervention. While other psychological measures did not show significant differences, this exploratory analysis revealed favorable trends, particularly in anxiety, spiritual well-being, and post-traumatic growth. At 3-month follow-up, most scales showed a diminished effect compared to post-intervention. Qualitative interviews revealed four themes: a safe and validating environment, acquiring skills and taking action, enhanced well-being, and exposure to memories of cancer. This last dimension was a source of beneficial inner work for most participants, although it was a deeply challenging experience for four women.
conclusionParticipation in the e-MBCR program led to beneficial experiences, notably self-exploration, and enhanced self-efficacy. However, MBIs can also bring up challenging experiences, which are important to acknowledge.
trial registrationNCT04564768.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.