ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026
Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Individuals With Binge-Eating Disorder: What Works for Whom?
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Individuals With Binge-Eating Disorder: What Works for Whom?The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate moderators and predictors of response to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for binge-eating disorder (BED).
methodModerators/predictors of treatment outcome, central to CBT and to DBT treatment, were chosen from an aggregated dataset of two clinical outcome studies with non-random allocation to treatment groups (N = 203). Both studies compared DBT-BED (n = 71) to a more intensive outpatient CBT program (CBT+, n = 132) in individuals with BED. Generalized linear models examined moderators and predictors of objective binge-eating (OBE) frequency at end of treatment (EOT) and six-month follow up (FU).
resultsBaseline shape/weight overvaluation, shape concerns and low self-esteem significantly predicted and moderated reductions in OBE frequency at EOT whereas difficulty in identifying feelings predicted and moderated outcome at FU. Emotional eating predicted outcome at FU (medium effect) and moderated outcome at EOT (large effect). Depression levels predicted, but not moderated, treatment outcome at both EOT and FU. For shape/weight overvaluation, shape concerns and low self-esteem, low levels were related to fewer reductions in outcome in DBT-BED than in CBT+. Individuals with the highest levels of emotional eating and difficulty identifying feelings showed more decrease in OBE episodes with DBT-BED than with CBT+ at EOT and FU respectively. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that BED treatment outcomes could be enhanced by matching individuals with certain symptom presentations to treatment overall, and to DBT-BED or CBT+ specifically. DBT-BED may be a promising alternative to CBT+ for those with more severe psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.