ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Neuroimaging in pediatric language development and disorders: a scoping review protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfancy and early childhood represent critical periods for language development, as well as for the diagnosis and intervention of language disorders. Neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), have revolutionized our understanding of the brain's role in language development and disorders. These techniques provide detailed insights into the neural mechanisms underlying language acquisition and the deviations associated with language disorders. However, there is a notable lack of comprehensive literature reviews on the application of neuroimaging techniques in studying pediatric language development and disorders, particularly in children under eight years old in the field of speech-language pathology. This gap in the literature hinders the ability to form a cohesive understanding of the current state of research and its clinical implications, i.e., garnering an understanding of the contributions of these technological tools in understanding language development and disorders.
methodsTo address this gap, we will conduct a scoping review to synthesize literature involving neuroimaging techniques that examines language development and disorders in typically developing children and those diagnosed with language disorders under the age of eight. This review will be guided by the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley [18]. A comprehensive and systematic search will be performed across multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and The Cochrane Library) to identify relevant peer-reviewed publications as well as grey literature. Studies will be screened according to predefined inclusion criteria. Key data from eligible studies will be extracted, synthesized and presented using both quantitative (numerical) and qualitative (narrative) approaches to address the research questions. DISCUSSION: This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview and summary of the methodologies and key findings in neuroimaging studies related to pediatric language development and disorders. The results will identify critical gaps in the current research, highlight the strengths and limitations of various neuroimaging techniques, and suggest future research directions in the field of pediatric neuroimaging for language development. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (osf.io/5jhk6).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.