ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2025
Toxicity assessment of doxycycline-aided artificial intelligence-assisted drug design targeting candidate 16S rRNA methyltransferase gene.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe misfunction of the protein 16SrRNA methyltransferase can result in Urinary tract infections (UTI), Gastrointestinal (GI) infections, sepsis, pneumonia, and wound infections; various tactics are used to lessen the fatal consequences. It confers resistance to aminoglycoside medications, which complicates the treatment of infections caused by these bacteria. Innovative methods are desperately needed to stop these diseases from spreading because there are no reliable medical therapies available.
objectivesHerein, we aim to evaluate Doxycycline's Role in AI-Driven Drug Design and identification of effective inhibitors targeting the 16S rRNA methyltransferase gene. Additionally, to investigate the toxicological profiles of designed drug through AI approach for advancement in medical sciences. METHODOLOGY: Methodology involves, selection of three effective de novo medicinal compounds that target the 16SrRNA methyltransferase protein for designing an AI driven drug. Multiple in silico tools were used for designing AI based drug includes: Expasy for protein annotation, ProtParam to calculate physiochemical parameters, SWISS-MODEL to estimate the 3D structure, and UniProt to generate the 16SrRNA methyltransferase protein sequence. An adequate foundation for the development and validation of AI-designed phytochemical medicines for infections is provided by quality assessment, binding site prediction, drug design with WADDAICA, toxicity screening, ADMET evaluation, and docking analysis with CB-dock.
resultsComprehensive pharmacokinetic and toxicology analyses confirm that the AI-designed doxycycline exhibits a non-toxic character, with particularly high absorption through the blood-brain barrier. Furthermore, the AI-designed doxycycline docked complex demonstrates a strong docking affinity with the 16S rRNA methyltransferase protein, showing a binding energy of approximately - 7.6 kcal/mol, suggesting significant therapeutic potential.
conclusionEven though the in silico studies show efficacy and safety, still there is need of in vivo trials to investigate the hidden medical aspects. By addressing existing constraints, presenting a non-invasive approach to infections, and providing viable substitutes for traditional surgical procedures, this work considerably expands the knowledge about newer methods and also helps to understand deep insights of dug design mechanism for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.