ArticleMalaria journal2025
Adherence to severe malaria treatment guidelines in Northern Uganda: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherence to severe malaria treatment guidelines is crucial for effective case management and reducing malaria-related morbidity and mortality. However, non-compliance among healthcare workers remains a challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study assessed the level of adherence to severe malaria treatment guidelines among healthcare workers in public hospitals in the Acholi sub-region of Northern Uganda and explored factors influencing this adherence.
methodsA convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitatively, 384 patient records from Anaka General Hospital, Kitgum General Hospital, and Gulu Regional Referral Hospital were reviewed using a checklist. Qualitative data were collected via key informant interviews (KIIs) among nine purposely selected Healthcare Workers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize adherence levels, and a modified Poisson regression analysis was conducted to identify associated factors. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Thematic analysis using NVivo software was done for the qualitative part.
resultsThe level of adherence to severe malaria treatment guidelines was 33.07%. Non-adherence was observed for recommended treatment with intravenous (IV) drugs followed by oral medications for severe malaria (38.3%) and treatment of only malaria confirmed (25%). Medical doctors were more likely to adhere to malaria treatment guidelines [aIRR 1.7, p = 0.035] than other professionals. The qualitative findings categorized the facilitators of adherence into four themes including healthcare workers' knowledge and training support, institutional and policy support, guidelines accessibility and ease use, healthcare workers positive attitudes and motivation. Barriers to adherence included knowledge and awareness gaps, resource availability constraints, as well as socio-cultural and patient factors.
conclusionAdherence to severe malaria treatment guidelines in Uganda is suboptimal, with significant gaps in prescribing practices. Institutionalization of routine refresher training, mentorship and support supervision for healthcare workers are critical to achieving Uganda's 2025 malaria reduction targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.