Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272822›Full record

ReviewBiomarker research2025

Glioma tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy: past, present, and future.

Josip Cvitković, Wen-Lu Tan, Tao Jiang, Zheng Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomarker research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Systemic and local dysregulation of the complement system in glioma: a comprehensive systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spatiotemporal cancer controlNanomedicine (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Josip Cvitković *Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Wen-Lu Tan *Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Tao JiangBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China. taojiang1964@163.com.
Zheng ZhaoBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China. zhaozheng0503@ccmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas constitute a major category of primary brain malignancies, characterized by limited therapeutic options and generally poor prognoses. Despite the promising outcomes of immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), in various cancers, their clinical efficacy in gliomas has remained modest. This limited efficacy is largely attributed to the brain's immune-privileged status and the profoundly immunosuppressive nature of the glioma tumor microenvironment (TME). These challenges underscore the urgent need to improve understanding of the glioma TME and to develop innovative strategies that enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in glioma immunobiology and immunotherapy, with emphasis on ongoing clinical trials and emerging combinatorial strategies. Current efforts to combine ICIs with modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy are highlighted, aiming to remodel the TME, improve antigen presentation, and stimulate more robust antitumor immune responses. The evolving landscape of glioma immunotherapy offers renewed hope for enhanced patient outcomes.Clinical trial registration Not applicable.

Indexed as

GliomaImmunotherapyTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41272822
PMCPMC12639954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.