ArticleHuman genomics2025
The HUGO Clinical Genomics & Genomic Medicine Education Survey: clinicians globally need and want genomic medicine training.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Making Genomic Data Actionable in Electronic Health Records: Practical Viewpoint on Standards, Governance, and Implementation.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Genomic medicine knowledge, self-assessment, and training needs among Turkish pediatricians: a cross-sectional survey.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study of genomic knowledge comfort, attitudes, ethical and educational perspectives on precision medicine among medical students in Ecuador.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Clinical Genomics & Genomic Medicine Education subcommittee of the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) reports on the results of an exploratory genomic medicine survey of healthcare providers (clinicians) in low- and middle-income countries.
results281 clinicians from 17 low- and middle-income countries responded to the survey. Representing 20 medical specialties, only 13.6% of clinician respondents are comfortable when discussing genomics in clinical settings. Over 90% of clinicians recognize that genetics and genomics are relevant to their practice and that there needs to be genetics/genomic assessment of patients. Respondents report a wide range of learning style preferences including self-paced online (asynchronous) and live-online educational programming covering introductory content, clinical guidelines for monogenic disorders and when to utilize genetic or genomic testing.
conclusionsClinician respondents recognize the importance of genomics and are eager for continuing medical education. Reponses from the survey suggest that a larger scale, second phase survey should be distributed globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.