ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Selective retina therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy with focal choroidal excavation: a retrospective case series of six eyes.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Selective Retina Therapy on Central Serous Chorioretinopathy with Serous Pigment Epithelial Detachments.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe evaluated the clinical outcomes of selective retina therapy (SRT) in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) who had nonconforming focal choroidal excavations (FCEs).
methodsAmong the 204 patients with chronic CSC who underwent SRT between June 2023 and February 2025, six patients (2.9%) with nonconforming FCEs were analyzed. Using a Q-switched Nd: YLF 527-nm laser device, SRT was applied at leaking points or in leakage areas according to the features observed on fundus fluorescein angiography. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), subfoveal choroidal thickness height, and mean deviation (MD) of retinal sensitivity were measured during the follow-up period.
resultsAmong the six patients, five patients showed complete subretinal fluid (SRF) resolution, while one patient demonstrated minimal persistent SRF during the follow-up period. Four patients showed an improvement in BCVA, while BCVA remained unchanged in the other two patients. All patients showed improvement in the MD of retinal sensitivity during the follow-up period. Among the six patients, two patients showed complete SRF resolution after a single session of SRT, while the other four patients required multiple SRT sessions. No SRT-related adverse events were observed during the follow-up period.
conclusionSRT produced favorable outcomes in the treatment of patients with CSC and nonconforming FCEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.