Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272799›Full record

ArticleSkeletal muscle2025

FLASH: innovative integrated enzymatic-fluorescent labeling for automated muscle fiber typing, metabolic and morphometric analysis.

Maxime Di Gallo, Thomas Guilbert, Doriane Pereira, Zoé Cepella, Raphaël Braud-Mussi, Edgar Jauliac, Gaspard Macaux, Florian Alexis Britto, Thierry Launay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maxime Di Gallo *Institut Cochin, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR8104, INSERM U1016, Paris, 75014 , France. maxime.di-gallo@inserm.fr.
Thomas Guilbert *Institut Cochin, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR8104, INSERM U1016, Paris, 75014 , France.
Doriane PereiraInstitut Cochin, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR8104, INSERM U1016, Paris, 75014 , France.
Zoé CepellaInstitut Cochin, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR8104, INSERM U1016, Paris, 75014 , France.
Raphaël Braud-MussiInstitut Cochin, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR8104, INSERM U1016, Paris, 75014 , France.
Edgar JauliacInstitut Cochin, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR8104, INSERM U1016, Paris, 75014 , France.
Gaspard MacauxInstitut Cochin, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR8104, INSERM U1016, Paris, 75014 , France.
Florian Alexis Britto *Institut Cochin, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR8104, INSERM U1016, Paris, 75014 , France.
Thierry Launay *Institut Cochin, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR8104, INSERM U1016, Paris, 75014 , France. thierry.launay@inserm.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkeletal muscle is a dynamic tissue capable of structural and metabolic remodeling in response to physiological and pathological stimuli. These adaptations are central to understanding the mechanisms underlying conditions such as genetic myopathies, cancer, aging, and recovery from injury. Muscle fiber characterization-assessing fiber type, size, and metabolic profile-is essential for such studies. However, conventional histological methods often rely on serial tissue sections and multiple staining protocols, which are time-consuming, require significant biological material, and introduce methodological bias.

methodsWe developed FLASH (Fluorescence-based Labeling for Assessing Skeletal muscle Histology), a novel methodology combining enzymatic (SDH or GPDH) and quadruple fluorescent labeling (Laminin, MYH4, MYH2, MYH7) on a single muscle section. The resulting images were analyzed using a custom macro in Fiji/ImageJ, integrating the Cellpose segmentation algorithm. This automated pipeline detects individual muscle fibers, quantifies their cross-sectional area (CSA), identifies fiber types based on myosin isoform expression, and measures enzymatic staining intensity. Batch analysis was implemented to process entire image folders automatically. Validation was performed by comparing automated fiber detection with expert manual segmentation using correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots.

resultsThe FLASH method allowed simultaneous assessment of both contractile and metabolic properties within individual fibers on the same section, removing the need for serial cuts. The automated image analysis achieved high accuracy in fiber detection (r > 0.95 compared to manual annotation) and produced consistent CSA and fiber-type quantification, even under suboptimal staining conditions. The macro enabled significant time savings by automating the complete analysis workflow, including ROI generation and Excel data export for each image.

conclusionsFLASH provides an efficient and robust tool for high-throughput skeletal muscle histology. By combining enzymatic and fluorescent co-labeling with machine learning-based image analysis, this method improves reproductibility, reduces experimental complexity, and minimizes user bias. FLASH is particularly well-suited for large-scale or longitudinal studies investigating muscle adaptation in health and disease.

Indexed as

Muscle Fibers, SkeletalStaining and LabelingAnimalsFluorescent DyesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceMyosin Heavy ChainsFluorescent DyesMyosin Heavy Chains

Identifiers

PMID41272799
PMCPMC12639953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.